‘wall Street Journal’ Finds The Perfect Democrat
Today’s Wall Street Journalcontains an op-ed by someone named Ted Van Dyk, a disillusioned Democrat that has fallen out of love with Barack Obama. “The first warning signals for me came with your acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention,” Van Dyk writes. “In it, you stressed domestic initiatives that clearly were nonstarters in the already shrinking economy. … Cut back both your proposals and expectations.“
Who the heck is this guy? According to his byline, he was Vice President Hubert Humphrey’s assistant and “active in national Democratic politics for over 40 years.” He claims to have campaigned for Kennedy, Humphrey, Tsongas, and George McGovern–but a Nexis search reveals that he has been posing as an “enraged Democrat” abandoned by Democrats since at least the Carter administration. Liberals should dissent, of course, but this guy is just ridiculous. Check out this assortment of his clippings.
There’s not really a clear line of ideological criticism that runs through his columns. Are Democrats too liberal? Are they not liberal enough? The only discernable constant is that Van Dyk touts his lefty credentials and then uses that credibility to rail against the Democrats in charge… almost as if he did that for a living. Congrats to the Journal on finding a true-blue Dem willing to bash Obama.
Attitudes About The News
A majority of Americans say they trust a few news sources more than others fewer say the news media are pretty much the same. These opinions have changed very little since 2004. For the most part, regular news audiences are more likely than the public to say they trust a few news sources more than others.
Fully eight-in-ten readers of magazines such as the New Yorker, Atlantic and Harpers, and Hannity, Maddow and OReilly viewers say there are a few sources they trust more than others. By contrast, just half of regular viewers of daytime talk shows trust some news sources more than others nearly as many say the media are pretty much the same.
A majority of the public also continues to prefer to get political news from sources that have no particular political point of view just 26% prefer news from sources that share their political views. Majorities of most news audiences say they want news with no political point of view, including seven-in-ten or more Colbert and Daily Show viewers, Economist readers, NPR listeners and readers of the New Yorker and similar magazines.
However, only about four-in-ten viewers of Hardball , Hannity , Maddow and listeners of Limbaugh say they prefer to get news from sources that dont have a particular political point of view.
How Biased Is Wsj
As a whole, media bias organizations assign WSJ a âModerate Rightâ bias.
AllSides helps illustrate how media sources can contain different levels of bias. They rate the news section of WSJ as âCenter,â based on a June 2021 survey of nearly 1,200 voters, as well as over 46,755 community ratings . However, they rate WSJâs Opinion section as âLean Rightâ and previously as âFar Rightâ prior to September 2018.
Despite this bias, the AllSides review notes that WSJâs Opinion section âdoes not outright ignore Left voices and perspectives, as many extremely biased outlets doâ and is âLean Right biased, but independent in thought.â
Meanwhile, Media Bias/Fact Check scores WSJ as âRight Center.â This is due to âlow biased news reporting combined with a strong right biased editorial stance.â They also rate WSJ as âMostly Factualâ because of âanti-climate, anti-science stances, and occasional misleading editorials.â Through the MBFC site, 37% of community votes assign a âLeast Biasedâ rating and 36% assign a âRight Centerâ rating.
Don’t Miss: Patriotic Golf Shirts For Men
Democrats Or Republicans: Who’s Better For Wall Street
Contrary to popular belief and applied assumptions, Democrats are the historical victors to the claim ‘better for the stock market’.
Since 1929, both parties have held the presidency for approximately 40 years each. According to The New York Times and data from Bloomberg, during this period the consolidated returns for the S& P under Republican rule give a gain of only 0.4%. If you exclude the 30s crash under Hoover, Republican reign produces a gain of 4.7%, still far below the compounded rate of 8.9% produced by their Democratic counterparts. Over that time, a theoretical $10,000 investment in the S& P over Democratic rule would have grown to over $300,000. Under Republican rule, the same $10,000 investment would be just over $51,000 today…and putting Hoover back in the mix dwindles your return leaving you with only $11,733.
Some will point out that there are countless factors in the production of market returns and the validity of such data are nominal at best. While this is understood, no one should discount 40 years of consistent historical data.
The research takes new light when running the same test against GDP. A similar pattern emerges as Democratic presidents produced a 5.4% GDP growth, contrasted by the Republicans’ 1.6%.
The irony in all of this is that it may be the myth that Republicans are better for the market that causes Democratic linked market gains to be so much greater.
One house one party is disliked and grafts a history of negative returns
Red States Winning: Wsj Reports Republican
According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Republican-run states are faring far better than Democrat-run states in the post-pandemic economy WSJ says the pandemic changed the geography of the economy.
From The Wall Street Journal
Since February 2020, the month before the pandemic began, the share of all U.S. jobs located in red states has grown by more than half a percentage point, according to an analysis of Labor Department data by the Brookings Institution think tank. Red states have added 341,000 jobs over that time, while blue states were still short 1.3 million jobs as of May.
Read Also: New England Patriots Ticket Office
Wall Street Journal: Inside The Republican Money Machine
This article originally appeared in the Wall Street Journal on September 24, 2010.
Inside the Republican Money Machine This year GOP backers have come close to matching spending by independent Democratic groups, thus leveling the playing field.
Republican strategists Ed Gillespie and Karl Rove were appalled last winter as they searched out well-funded conservative groups that were preparing to support GOP congressional candidates in the 2010 midterm. They sensed there were too few of them and that a once-in-a-generation opportunity might be lost. Short of money and grass-roots activism, GOP candidates would be easy prey for lavishly funded Democratic opponentsnot to mention liberal groups committed to spending hundreds of millions on attack ads.
This scenario has been averted. Conservatives and Republicans have organized an army of independent groups in a shrewd, collaborative and well-financed effort. While old standbysthe National Rifle Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerceare involved, they now have reinforcements. Theyve come close to matching overall spending by Democratic groups, thus leveling the campaign playing field and enhancing Republican chances of capturing the House, Senate, and more governorships and state legislatures in 2010.
Mr. Barnes is executive editor of the Weekly Standard and a commentator on Fox News Channel.
News Corporation And News Corp
On May 2, 2007, News Corporation made an unsolicited takeover bid for Dow Jones, offering US$60 a share for stock that had been selling for US$33 a share. The Bancroft family, which controlled more than 60% of the voting stock, at first rejected the offer, but later reconsidered its position.
Three months later, on August 1, 2007, News Corporation and Dow Jones entered into a definitive merger agreement. The US$5 billion sale added The Wall Street Journal to Rupert Murdoch‘s news empire, which already included Fox News Channel, financial network unit and London’s The Times, and locally within New York, the New York Post, along with Foxflagship stationWNYW and MyNetworkTV flagship WWOR .
On December 13, 2007, shareholders representing more than 60 percent of Dow Jones’s voting stock approved the company’s acquisition by News Corporation.
In an editorial page column, publisher L. Gordon Crovitz said the Bancrofts and News Corporation had agreed that the Journal‘s news and opinion sections would preserve their editorial independence from their new corporate parent:
A special committee was established to oversee the paper’s editorial integrity. When the managing editor resigned on April 22, 2008, the committee said that News Corporation had violated its agreement by not notifying the committee earlier. However, Brauchli said he believed that new owners should appoint their own editor.
The “Personal Journal” section branding was brought back in July 2020.
Don’t Miss: Did Trump Forgive Student Debt
Wall Street Journal Staffers Express Relief Over Editor Change
Matt Murray, who was named editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires, poses for a photo on June 5 in New York. | Matthew Riva/The Wall Street Journal via AP
06/05/2018 07:34 PM EDT
When Gerard Baker was named editor-in-chief of the Wall Street Journal in 2012, owner Rupert Murdoch poured Champagne on his head during a lively newsroom celebration, with News Corp. chief Robert Thomson giddily clapping along.
The news Tuesday that Baker was stepping down, to be replaced by executive editor Matt Murray, was low key. Many staffers learned about it when the press release dropped. There were no similar newsroom festivities.
Nonetheless, it was an emotional moment for a newspaper that has struggled with a staff exodus and lack of confidence in its leadership. The dominant feeling in the Journal newsroom wasnt Champagne-popping jubilation but relief. The elevation of Murray, a Journal mainstay for almost a quarter century, was greeted favorably among staff after a dramatic past couple years thats included frustrations over Bakers perceived unwillingness to go after Donald Trump boiling over publicly, along with high-level departures in New York and a mini-exodus from the Washington bureau.
Current and former staffers praised the selection of Murray, characterizing the Journal lifer as a steady hand and more affable presence in the newsroom than Baker, who could be seen as aloof.
- Filed under:
Funding Financing And Ownership
Note: Funding and ownership is not taken into account when determining AllSides Media Bias Ratings. While it’s true ownership and financial interests can affect what goes to print, our bias ratings are determined by assessing the bias of content only. We provide financial and ownership information as an FYI to our readers.
In 2007 Rupert Murdoch bought the Wall Street Journal with the $5 billion purchase of its parent company, Dow Jones & Co. Rupert Murdoch is the owner of News Corp. News Corp. is the owner of hundreds of national and international publishing outlets including The New York Post, Fox News, and many other outlets.
Financing and ownership information last updated February 22, 2021. If you think this information is out of date or needs to be updated, please .
Also Check: Used Jeep Patriot Rims For Sale
Wall Street Journal Rated Center In July 2021 Allsides Blind Bias Survey
In the y, in which people across the political spectrum rated content from WSJ’s news section without knowing the source, the average rating was Center.
On average, 1,195 people rated WSJ as Center. A majority of people who self-identified as having a Left, Lean Left, Center, or Lean Right bias rated WSJ as Center a plurality of people with a Right biased rated it Center, with the second most common response for WSJ being Lean Right.
About The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal is an international, business-focused, daily newspaper based in New York City. A division of News Corp and published six days a week by Dow Jones & Company, the Journal is the most widely circulated newspaper in the United States. It has printed continuously since it was founded by Charles Dow, Edward Jones, and Charles Bergstresser on July 8, 1889. Daily editions of the newspaper are posted on its website, which also includes Home, World, U.S., Politics, Economy, Business, Tech, Market, Arts, Life, Real Estate and Opinion sections.
You May Like: How Many Democrats Republicans Are In The Senate
Third Party Studies And Comments On Wsj Bias
In a 2005 academic study, Tim Groseclose, a former professor of political science at UCLA, developed a measure, the Slant Quotient , a number that shows how often a news outlet cites one or more of some 200 think tanks. The bigger the S.Q., the more liberal the news outlet. He found the Wall Street Journal is left of center, with a 55.1 SQ. For comparison, he found the most liberal newspaper to be the Detroit Free Press and the New York Times to be very liberal . He found WSJ to be more liberal than NPR or The New York Times. In the full report published in the November 2005 issue of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, the author notes:
“Irvine and Kincaid note that The Journal has had a long-standing separation between its conservative editorial pages and its liberal news pages. Sperry notes that the news division of the Journal sometimes calls the editorial division Nazis. Fact is, Sperry writes, the Journals news and editorial departments are as politically polarized as North and South Korea.”
Wall Street Journal Op
Mike Bloomberg|August 15, 2022
Republicans often rightly complain that college campuses are hostile to the free exchange of ideas. Speakers over the past decade have regularly been disinvited, shouted down and even physically attacked by student activists unwilling to entertain different ideas and perspectives. This behavior is anathema to a universitys mission and deeply damaging to our nation.
Unfortunately, instead of taking a principled stand for free speech, many Republicans are now saying: If you cant beat em, join em.
Consider Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who signed a bill that as of July 1 bars professors from expressing any view in a classroom that espouses, promotes, advances anything that could make students feel guilty about history, as it relates to race and gender. The bill is known as the Stop Woke Act, short for Stop Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees, and its principal target is critical race theory, which has become a bugaboo on the right and is divisive on the left.
Free inquiry and discourseincluding professing ideas and beliefslie at the heart of higher education and democratic society. In both the sciences and humanities, rigorous debates based on facts, data and reason allow ideas and theories to be evaluated and amended, adopted and discarded, in ways that promote understanding, advance knowledge and teach responsible citizenship.
What News Sources Are Left
There is no completely clear answer to this question because there is no one exact methodology to measure and rate the partisan bias of news sources.
Here are a couple of resources that can help:
- AllSidesAll Sides is a news website that presents multiple sources side by side in order to provide the full scope of news reporting.
The Allsides Bias Ratings page allows you to filter a list of news sources by bias .
AllSides uses a patented bias rating system to classify news sources as left, center, or right leaning. Components of the rating system include crowd-sourcing, surveys, internal research, and use of third party sources such as Wikipedia and research conducted by Groseclose and Milyo at UCLA. Note that while the Groseclose & Milyo results are popular, the methodology it is not without critique.
Note that AllSides does periodically revisit classifications for particular sources and their ratings may change over time. In some instances, the News and Opinion sections of a specific news outlet may be rated separately .
- Pew Research Center – Political PolarizationSurvey data reveals the news source favored by people according to their political beliefs.
A report based on a 2014 survey shows which news sources are used and considered trustworthy based on individual’s political values . Note that this report measures the political leanings of the audience rather than the source itself.
Ies See Big Demographic Changes Despite Overall Static Split
WASHINGTON The last decade was one of the most politically consequential in recent memory, one in which partisan divisions dominated. But under the surface, an enormous churn is redefining and re-sorting the two major parties.
A look at the numbers helps explain the larger story.
By events alone, the decade was tumultuous from the Republican tsunami in 2010 to the rise of Donald Trump in 2016 and the Democratic correction in 2018. And yet, when you look at the percentage of voters who identify at a Democrat or Republican, the picture is one of stability.
In 2010, the NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll found that 42 percent of registered voters identified as Democrats, while 37 percent identified as Republicans. At the end of 2019, the figures showed 42 percent were Democrats and 37 percent were Republicans. Unchanged.
In other words, Barack Obama and Donald Trump may each be transformative presidents in their own ways, but viewed from 30,000 feet, the net effect of their time in office on the political landscape has been negligible.
Look a little closer, however, and the picture is much more fluid.
Start with education. The last decade has seen noteworthy shifts among voters with and without a college degree.
Those are dramatic swings among big parts of the electorate that have impacts across the country. Its a big part of the reason Democrats have increased their margins in highly educated urban areas.
Wsj: Republicans Have A Plan To Fight Biden
President Bidens has no plan to address inflation, and his current proposals will make inflation even worse. If fighting inflation is Democrats top priority, they should stop offering partisan gimmicks and work with Republicans to get the economy back on track. As the Wall Street Journal reported:
- The Biden Administration has offered no real solutionsjust more Washington spending and higher taxes on Main Street businesses that will fuel higher prices in the future, said Rep. Kevin Brady , the top Republican on the Ways and Means Committee.
- Republicans have focused on inflation, which hit 8.6 percent in May for its highest level since 1981, as Democrats greatest vulnerability this fall. They have argued that the Biden Administrations policies, including its push to enact a $1.9 trillion pandemic aid package in early 2021, have helped fuel price increases.
Note: This claim is supported by a San Francisco Federal Reserve analysis showing that the U.S. is leading the world on inflation due in part to President Bidens stimulus.
- The House outline includes policies that Republicans have advocated before, including rescinding unused federal spending, extending expiring tax cuts, increasing energy production and removing some regulations..
to read more in the Wall Street Journal.
to read Ways and Means Republicans Steps to Fight Biden-flation.