Popular Initiative For The Couple And The Family
In 2011, the Christian Democratic People’s Party began gathering signatures for a popular initiative entitled “For the couple and the family – No to the penalty of marriage” . This initiative sought to amend article 14 of the Swiss Federal Constitution to equalise fiscal rights and social security benefits between married couples and unmarried cohabiting couples. However, the text would also introduce a definition of marriage for the first time, specifically the “sole union between a man and a woman”.
Under Swiss law, cohabiting unmarried couples are entitled to two full pensions. However, the pension of married couples is limited to 150% of the maximum pension per person, meaning that if both partners earn relatively well during their working life, they receive only one and a half times the maximum pension instead of two full pensions.
After having rejected both counter-propositions from the Greens and the Green Liberals, the National Council finally approved a suggestion from the Commission for Economic Affairs and Taxation, which retained the spirit of the initiative but removed the definition of marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman. This counter-proposition was approved 10286, thus rejecting the popular initiative and recommending to the Swiss electorate to reject the initiative and accept the counter-proposition.
Religion Continues To Be Major Factor In Attitudes Toward Gay Marriage
As in the past, religious groups are deeply divided about same-sex marriage. And adults who do not identify with an organized religion whose ranks are growing are more likely than those who affiliate with a religion to support gay marriage.
Fully 85% of those who are religiously unaffiliated favor same-sex marriage, up from 60% in 2005. Majorities of white mainline Protestants and Catholics support same-sex marriage a decade ago just 39% of both groups supported it.
But just 33% of black Protestants and 27% of white evangelical Protestants favor same-sex marriage. Majorities of both groups oppose gay marriage.
Opinion among black Protestants has changed relatively modestly over the past decade in 2005, 25% favored gay marriage. And while support among white evangelical Protestants has increased 13 points , white evangelicals oppose gay marriage by far greater than two-to-one.
Overall, 68% of adults who attend religious services less than once a week favor gay marriage, compared with 34% who attend weekly or more. In 2005, 48% of less frequent attenders of religious services backed gay marriage, as did 19% of those who attended more frequently.
Gay Marriage And The Federal Government
Democrats believe in leaving marriage a stat-by-state issue. They disagree with having a federal ban on gay marriage, stating, in our country, marriage has been defined at the state level for 200 years, and we believe it should continue to be defined there. However, they would prefer to see gay marriage legalized in every state, stating, we oppose discriminatory federal and state constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny equal protection of the laws to committed same-sex couples who seek the same respect and responsibilities as other married couples. We supportthe passage of the Respect for Marriage Act.
Gender Family And Marriage Same
Americans generally believe that women continue to face obstacles that make it more difficult for them to get ahead than men. While there are sizable gender differences in these opinions, the partisan divide is even more pronounced.
Overall, 57% of adults say that significant obstacles still make it harder for women to get ahead than men. About four-in-ten say that the obstacles that once made it harder for women to get ahead are largely gone.
The publics views on whether it is more difficult for women to advance have changed modestly since 2016, when 53% of the public said women still face significant obstacles.
Men and women hold very different views on whether obstacles continue to stand in the way of womens advancement: Nearly seven-in-ten women say there are still significant obstacles that make it harder for women to get ahead than men, compared with 43% of men.
But the partisan differences are even wider: While 77% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say significant obstacles continue to make it harder for women to get ahead, just a third of Republicans and Republican leaners say the same.
White adults are less likely than black and Hispanic adults to say significant obstacles remain that make it harder for women to get ahead than men. Black adults are the least likely to say the obstacles women face are largely gone.
Growth In Support For Same
As would be expected at a high-water mark in national support for same-sex marriage, all age groups are the most supportive they have been to date. Still, age differences remain, with 84% of young adults, 72% of middle-aged adults, and 60% of older adults saying they favor same-sex marriage.
Line graph. The percentage of Americans who say same-sex marriage should be recognized by law as valid, by age group. 84% of Americans aged 18-34, 72% of those aged 35-54 and 60% of those 55 years of age or older in 2021 say same-sex marriage should be recognized by law as valid.
On Lgbtq Rights A Gulf Between Trump And Many Republican Voters
As more Republicans say they support at least some L.G.B.T.Q. protections, President Trump and party leaders continue to stand in opposition and particularly target transgender Americans.
When President George W. Bush needed to shore up support with social conservatives during his re-election run in 2004, he turned to a familiar political tactic: demonizing L.G.B.T.Q. rights. On the campaign trail and from the White House, the Republican leader began championing a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, praising unions between a man and woman as critical to the well-being of families.
Sixteen years later, when another issue of L.G.B.T.Q. rights popped up in the midst of another presidential campaign, the Republican incumbent responded with little more than a shrug.
They ruled and we live with their decision, President Trump told reporters after the Supreme Court issued a decision on Monday protecting the rights of L.G.B.T.Q. workers. Thats what its all about. We live with the decision of the Supreme Court.
Yet today, widespread battles over L.G.B.T.Q. rights are less frequent among parts of the Republican Party not just among some corporate leaders and political donors who dislike openly bigoted fights, but also among many of the rank-and-file Republicans who say in polling that they support at least some rights and protections for L.G.B.T.Q. people.
Gop Platform Supports Lgbt+ Discrimination
As well as encouraging the reversal of equal marriage in the US, the Republican platform also clearly supports businesses and charities that discriminate against LGBT+ people in the name of religion, condemning government discrimination against individuals and businesses for acting on the belief that marriage is the union of one man and one woman.
The platform promotes replacing sex education with sexual risk avoidance education that sets abstinence until marriage as the responsible and respected standard of behaviour, and states that trans people using restrooms, locker rooms, and other facilities that match their gender is at once illegal, dangerous, and ignores privacy issues.
It even contains a nod to conversion therapy when it says: We support the right of parents to determine the proper medical treatment and therapy for their minor children.
Aside from its horrific positions on LGBT+ rights, the Trump administrations decision to keep the Republican platform the same is confusing.
It repeatedly refers to plans for legislation which in 2020 have already been passed, and also attacks the current administration, which in 2016 was Obamas Democratic government.
You May Like: Walkers Patriot Series
John Boehner On Gay Marriage
When section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was repealed, Boehner stood behind the act nonetheless, claiming the constitutionality of a law should be judged by the court, not by the president unilaterally. He added that he was obviously disappointed by the decision to repeal the law, and that he hopes that states will rule to define marriage strictly as a union between one man and one woman.
Gay Marriage Should Be Aloud
Gay marriage should be aloud because everyone should have the same right to marry the people that they love after all you cant choose the people you fall in love with you cant choose your sexuality and you cant change that no matter what people say or want they do.If you were gay how would you feel if you couldn’t see the person you loved whilst on their death bed because of idiot rights.
You May Like: Democrats Or Republicans
Republicans Who Stood Up For The Lgbt Community
While homophobia and transphobia seem to be fueling GOP policy, it doesnt have to be that way: Below, weve spotlighted Republican politicians who broke rank to support the LGBT community. The intention isnt to pat gay-friendly Republicans on the back, but to remind their colleagues that fighting for equality and being in the Grand Old Party are not mutually exclusive.
Gay Rights And Religion
While the Democratic Party stands behind gay couples having the same rights as heterosexual couples, Democrats also believe that religious organizations should be able to choose what they do and do not recognize as marriage in terms of a religious sacrament. For this reason, they do not believe in mandating that churches recognize homosexual marriages the same way that the government must. The 2012 Democratic Party Platform states, we also support the freedom of churches and religious entities to decide how to administer marriage as a religious sacrament without government interference.
Also Check: Registered Democrats In Usa
Get Our Free Weekly Newsletter
There are also clues in his dissent in Obergefell that, had the case been framed as a narrower issue of equal protection, he might have joined the majority. In Obergefell, the chief justice noted, he equal protection analysis might be different, in my view, if we were confronted with a more focused challenge to the denial of certain tangible benefits. Of course, that is precisely what happened in Pavan the denial of specific rights to same-sex married couples that were given to opposite-sex married couples.
If Justice Kennedy steps down in the next few years, and President Donald Trump appoints a new Supreme Court justice, there undoubtedly will be challenges to Obergefell, even if the President views same-sex marriage as settled. A new justice could easily vote to overrule Obergefell. But the chief justices vote in Pavan may be a harbinger of a willingness to protect the hard-earned rights of marriage equality. At least it is a glimmer of hope to the LGBTQ community.
Food And Drug Administration Policy
Paul proposes sharply reducing the government’s regulation of medications and health supplements by reducing the role of, and ultimately eliminating, the Food and Drug Administration . In a 2011 interview, Paul said, “Well, the FDA just serves the drug companies … they also prevent drugs from coming on the market 10, 15 years later than other countries have it. So, yes, government just gets in the way on so many of those things.” He favors allowing FDA-approved prescription drugs to be imported from foreign countries and sold at a lower cost than the same drugs otherwise sell for in the US â thereby allowing international markets to set drug prices in the US market â a practice that has been prohibited by the FDA. In the interest, as he sees it, of fighting for greater freedom of choice for consumers, he has also introduced bills that would significantly reduce the government’s ability to prevent manufacturers or sellers of dietary supplements and certain other health products from making what government regulators believe to be false or misleading claims about the health effects of the products. He essentially feels that consumers should be able to buy whatever health aids they want from whomever they want, without the need for guidance by the government.
Medical Malpractice Law Reform
Paul has proposed radical changes in the way medical malpractice claims are handled. Under bills he has introduced multiple times beginning in 2003, a patient planning pregnancy, surgery, or other major medical procedures or medical treatment would be able to buy “negative outcomes” insurance at very low cost. If the patient were to experience a negative outcome in association with the medical procedure or treatment, he or she would then seek compensation through binding arbitration, rather than through a medical malpractice trial before a jury. Paul claims that “using insurance, private contracts, and binding arbitration to resolve medical disputes benefits patients, who receive full compensation in a timelier manner than under the current system,” as well as physicians and hospitals, since their litigation costs, and malpractice insurance premiums, would be markedly reduced.
How Out Of Step Is The Republican Party On Gay Rights
The wedding wasnt the only reason conservatives targeted Rep. Denver Riggleman in a party convention , but it was the driving one. Which raises the question: How out of step with the nation is the Republican Party on same-sex rights?
Its an especially pertinent question on Monday, now that the Supreme Court, with the support of one of President Trumps nominees, just voted 6-3 that existing federal law protects gay and transgender workers from discrimination based on sex.
Thats a sea change in the legal landscape of protections for LGBTQ Americans. Before this ruling, in about half of the states, you could be legally fired for being gay or transgender. Now, you cant under the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which the court ruled extends to LGBTQ Americans because it prevents discrimination on the basis of sex.
But like the Republican voters in Virginia who ousted Riggleman in favor of social conservative Bob Good, there is an active wing of the Republican Party seeking to push back on the march toward expanding legal protections for gay and transgender Americans. And they have powerful allies.
The Trump administration opposed interpreting the Civil Rights Act to encompass LGBTQ workers. The leader of the conservative Judicial Crisis Network called the six justices who supported this ruling, one of whom was Trump appointee Neil M. Gorsuch, activists, implying the court got ahead of where the public is on the issue.
Emily Guskin contributed to this report.
Recommended Reading: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans
Lower Spending And Smaller Government
Paul believes the size of the federal government must be decreased substantially. In order to restrict the federal government to what he believes are its Constitutionally authorized functions, he regularly votes against almost all proposals for new government spending, initiatives, or taxes, in many cases making him in a minority of members of the house by doing so. For example, on January 22, 2007, Paul was the lone member out of 415 voting to oppose a House measure to create a National Archives exhibit on slavery and Reconstruction, seeing this as an unauthorized use of taxpayer money.
What Is The Republican View On Same
A basic nutshell of the Republican Party is that they are for more “traditional” practices. While I am as liberal as you an get, the Republican Party typically cites The Bible as their motivational force, and we all know that damned Leviticus passage …
However, there are some Republicans who are pro gay-marriage. But sadly, the general Republican Party is against gay marriage.
they dont like it
ANSWER: I’m a Republican, and, yes I am a Christian, but that is a good thing, not bad. I don’t hate the gay people, but I hate their belief.They are against same sex marriage
You May Like: Us Senate By Party
Gay Marriage And Religion
Democrats believe that religious organizations should be able to choose what they do and do not recognize as marriage in terms of a religious sacrament. The 2012 Democratic Party Platform states, we also support the freedom of churches and religious entities to decide how to administer marriage as a religious sacrament without government interference.
George W Bush On Gay Marriage
President Bush endorsed a proposed constitutional amendment to restrict marriages to one man one women in 2004. He believed the Defense of Marriage Act was vulnerable, and believed this amendment to be a more concrete solution to protecting the institution of marriage. However, in January of 2005, he stated that he would not lobby on behalf of the amendment banning same-sex marriage, because a large number of senators believed the Defense of Marriage Act would withstand a constitutional challenge, and therefore the amendment was not necessary.
Also Check: How Many Republican Us Senators
Proposal To Eliminate Medicare
Paul proposes that all government funding of medical care be eliminated . His Plan to Restore America budget proposal would begin a phase out of Medicare starting in 2013, when workers younger than 25 would be able to opt out of participating in the program. He says that during the transition period, the commitments for coverage under Medicare that have already been made to older workers could be honored by cutting other government spending, such as by closing all US military bases overseas and ceasing to engage in foreign military “adventurism.”
Gallup: Majority Of Republicans Support Same
Overall support has also reached a new high.
In the U.S., support for same-sex marriage has reached a new high of 70 percent, according to a new poll by Gallup.
The new high shows an increase of 10 percent since the Supreme Court ruled on marriage equality in 2015. Its an upward trend, Gallup notes, thats been happening for a quarter of a century.
When Gallup first asked respondents if they supported a legal recognition of gay and lesbian marriages in 1996, only 26 percent were in support.
In 2011, Gallup reported for the first time that a majority of respondents supported marriage equality.
This year, a majority of respondents at 55 percent who identified as Republicans supported same-sex marriage for the first time, according to Gallup.
More than 80 percent of Democrats support marriage equality, which hasnt shifted in several years. Independents support it at 73%, which is higher than previous years when the range was 68 to 71 percent from 2017 to 2020.
Age changes the position on same-sex marriage, but a majority in each age group still favors it: 84 percent of young adults support it, 72 percent of middle-aged adults support it, and 60 percent of older adults support it.
The new numbers came from Gallups annual Values and Beliefs poll that was conducted from May 3-18 from a random sample of phone interviews with 1,000 people.
Don’t Miss: Why Did Republicans Vote Against Equal Pay